First of all, think you all do a great job and like you all in his/her own way........there are 2 things that in my opinion could make the show better. More time may be spent on new talents, as the well-known fighters on the Glory and UFC maincard are discussed at length at Warriorcode and several programs anyway.

My 2nd point is mainly about the previews and afterthoughts. Everyone has his or her favorite fighters because they train at the same gym, are Balkan fighters or have roots in beautiful Suriname. However, this sometimes kills the review if because of this no opinion can be given at certain matches. You don't have to destroy your favorite fighter in a preview/evaluation and you don't have to cheer against him either, but at least mention what the opponent does well and where the chances for the opponent lie. Instead of choosing the winning fighter, you can also indicate for both fighters where their strengths lie to win the match. This way you don't have to worry about stepping on toes.

@Cheyenne When you express an unvarnished opinion you will always be criticized and hater. This just means you are doing a good job. Just keep going nicely more, they are not personal attacks you are just analyzing the matches. By the way I do expect you to cover Natalia Silva who is going to fight this weekend :p. Maybe also nice to include Onefc Haggerthy vs Superlek.

@RemyBonjasky Better put that blonde in place of that Autist who can't speak Dutch and has fking weird pronunciation. That blonde talks smooth and natural. Is better for the program Remy if you put her in place and take the ropes I hands! No offense but your program would look much more professional and better then.

Should you guys do program after event more often

Nice and fast! Good job!